Counterculture Con HQ

January 21, 2010

Report: Nothing Learned From Ft. Hood Slaughter

Hasan: Sudden Jihad Syndrome

It’s been almost 3 months since the Ft. Hood massacre–still too early to jump to conclusions.

FT. HOOD REPORT: WHY NO MENTION OF ISLAM?

The U.S. military’s just-released report into the Fort Hood shootings spends 86 pages detailing various slipups by Army officers but not once mentions Major Nidal Hasan by name or even discusses whether the killings may have had anything to do with the suspect’s view of his Muslim faith. And as Congress opens two days of hearings on Wednesday into the Pentagon probe of the Nov. 5 attack that left 13 dead, lawmakers want explanations for that omission.

John Lehman, a member of the 9/11 commission and Navy Secretary during the Reagan Administration, says a reluctance to cause offense by citing Hasan’s view of his Muslim faith and the U.S. military’s activities in Muslim countries as a possible trigger for his alleged rampage reflects a problem that has gotten worse in the 40 years that Lehman has spent in and around the U.S. military. The Pentagon report’s silence on Islamic extremism “shows you how deeply entrenched the values of political correctness have become,” he told TIME on Tuesday. “It’s definitely getting worse, and is now so ingrained that people no longer smirk when it happens.”

The apparent lack of curiosity into what allegedly drove Hasan to kill isn’t in keeping with the military’s ethos; it’s a remarkable omission for the U.S. armed forces, whose young officers are often ordered to read Sun Tzu’s The Art of War with its command to know your enemy. In midcareer, they study the contrast between capabilities and intentions, which is why they aren’t afraid of a British nuclear weapon but do fear the prospect of Iran getting one.

Yet the leaders of the two-month Pentagon review, former Army Secretary Togo West and the Navy’s onetime top admiral, Vernon Clark, told reporters last week that they didn’t drill down into Hasan’s motives. “Our concern is with actions and effects, not necessarily with motivations,” West said. Added Clark: “We certainly do not cite a particular group.” Part of their reticence, they said, was to avoid running afoul of the criminal probe of Hasan that is now under way. Both are declining interview requests before their congressional testimony, a Pentagon spokesman said.

But without a motive, there would have been no murder. Hasan wore his radical Islamic faith and its jihadist tendencies in the same way he wore his Army uniform. He allegedly proselytized within the ranks, spoke out against the wars his Army was waging in Muslim countries and shouted “Allahu akbar” (God is great) as he gunned down his fellow soldiers. Those who served alongside Hasan find the Pentagon review wanting. “The report demonstrates that we are unwilling to identify and confront the real enemy of political Islam,” says a former military colleague of Hasan, speaking privately because he was ordered not to talk about the case. “Political correctness has brainwashed us to the point that we no longer understand our heritage and cannot admit who, or what, the enemy stands for.”

Say it with me:  MUST. NOT. JUMP. TO. CONCLUSIONS.

It’s obvious these reports are not being written solely for internal use, but are written with public consumption in mind.  The authors are self-censoring because of political correctness and weighing every word they write against how it will be received by our politicians and the public at large, not based on preventing another massacre.  These reports are in effect political documents written to safeguard careers by not pissing off the wrong people because I don’t believe what the authors are really thinking is actually reaching the page.  Perhaps this is just a report of little consequence.  After all, a few massacres here and there at our military installations doesn’t spell the end of civilization.  But the fear of speaking honestly and openly here does mirror what is happenning at the higher policy level, and in society at large.  It is a microcosm of what afflicts the West.  We do not know who our enemy is, nor do we want to.  And that does threaten our civilization.

Advertisements

1 Comment »

  1. Just the fact that this piece of Islamic shit is still alive is an Obamamation. He shouldn’t live much beyond his victims and his death should be much, much, much slower. Give him to me and there will never be any copy cats in the future.

    Comment by greyrooster — January 23, 2010 @ 00:21


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: