Counterculture Con HQ

January 27, 2010

Second Pregnant “Man” Due To Give Birth

Pregnant "man".

I know, you just threw up a little bit in your mouth.  A sign of the times below.


A transgender couple have revealed they are expecting their first baby in a month’s time.  Scott Moore – thought to be only the second ‘pregnant man’ to go public – is due to give birth to a boy in February, with husband Thomas by his side. The couple were both born girls and have undergone surgery to transform their sex. Scott, 30, who is legally married to Thomas because he still has a female birth certificate, says he is eagerly looking forward to giving birth.  They have decided to call the child ‘Miles’.  ‘We know some people will criticise us but we are blissfully happy and not ashamed,’ Scott said.

The couple, from California, already have two children – Gregg, 12, and Logan, 10 – who Thomas had with a previous female partner.  The case is similar to that of Thomas Beatie, from Oregon, who made headlines around the world in 2008 when he gave birth to a girl. Scott, who started out in life as a girl named Jessica, first realised he wanted to be a man when he hit puberty aged 11.  ‘When I told my family they thought I was crazy but they gradually realised I was serious and allowed me to start taking male hormones when I was 16 years old,’ he said.

His parents paid £4,600 for Scott to have his 36DDD chest removed. However, he could not afford the gender surgery, so still has female organs.  Thomas, who used to be called Laura, had a hysterectomy and gender reassignment surgery last year.  They met in 2005 at a support group meeting for transgender men but lost touch – but saw each other again in 2007.  ‘We knew we had to be together,’ Scott said. ‘Two months later I gave up my job to live with Thomas and the boys.

‘Now they call me “dad two”.’The couple, who live in a four-bedroom house, decided in December 2008 to try for a baby.  Scott was inseminated with the sperm of a male friend and fell pregnant in June 2009.  ‘We were so happy we did what all gay men do when they get excited – we went shopping,’ Thomas said.  The couple have dismissed concerns that Miles might be teased at school, saying they are confident they can deal with it.  ‘We’ve been through it already,’ Thomas said.  ‘My son Logan was bullied but now he just says to teasers: “You may have a problem with my two dads but I don’t so you’re not hurting me”.’

Scott plans to have a natural birth at their local hospital. Their doctor and obstetrician have told the medics at the local hospital.  ‘We didn’t want everyone to be shocked when a man turns up to give birth,’ Scott said.‘We found it very difficult to get a doctor and midwife at first. It was hard when people didn’t want to treat me.  ‘No pregnant person should be denied healthcare just because they are a man.’ But he added: ‘I’m looking forward to giving birth now. With Thomas at my side everything will be just fine.’  Thomas said: ‘We want to show the world that trans-families can be healthy, loving and nurturing.’


Is this a bit creepy?  Then you must be a homophobe.  That, or something is very wrong with this picture.  The perception shapers in the mainstream media would have you believe the former–that you are a hater for thinking this is wack.  Notice how they refer to him/her as a ‘man’, but without the quotes because we are expected to accept it as a given–he’s a man.  Even though she’s actually a woman.  If this had been reported merely as “Lesbian couple who look like men give birth to child” I might have overlooked it.  The secular progressives have been entirely successful in desensitizing me to the ghey.  But that’s not how they reported it.  They push it even further here.  It’s a Man baby! giving birth.  No quotes around Man.  Which sounds like more of that of secular progressive runaway train thingy trying to normalize the fringe and make it mainstream.  Because she’s not a man, she’s a woman.  That’s why she’s giving birth!  I’m not asking for these disturbed people to be demonized and attacked.  I pity them, I don’t hate them.  Jesus was full of grace.  And He is the standard here at CCHQ.  But he had no tolerance for sin either.  So my question is this:  what would Jesus think?  How would he react to this?  Is normalizing of the fringe and everything dysfunctional in society for the sake of the disturbed few something we must simply accept here?  Is that what grace looks like?  And if not, how should we view this.


  1. They need to install a one-year lifespan on all transgender as a fail safe to prevent them from developing emotions and desire for independence.

    Comment by Roy Batty — January 27, 2010 @ 12:36

  2. Implants! You’re talking about implants. Thanks, that was very helpful.

    Comment by Jesusland — January 27, 2010 @ 13:09

  3. Incept dates.

    Comment by Roy Batty — January 27, 2010 @ 13:34

  4. SICK.

    Comment by greyrooster — January 28, 2010 @ 19:31

  5. Hey, you used to write wonderful articles, but the last few posts have been kinda lackluster… I miss your tremendous posts. Past few posts are just a little out of track!

    Comment by cost numbers 0800 uk — February 24, 2012 @ 12:26

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: