Counterculture Con HQ

March 24, 2010

The Leftwing riots Again, shuts down Ann Coulter’s speech

Hippie: Free speech for me, not for you

Campus liberals get their fascism on.

DRUDGE: Flash:  Ann Coulter Ottawa speech shut down… 2,000 protesters surrounding building with rocks and sticks — pulled fire alarm in building. Blogs calling for Coulter to be hurt.  Cops shut it down! MPs were banned from going, Coulter denounced by an MP in the Parliament.

More details here:

OTTAWA — After protesters at the University of Ottawa prevented Ann Coulter from giving a speech Tuesday night, the American conservative writer said it proved the point she came to make — free speech in Canada leaves much to be desired.

Then she said what she really thought of the student protesters who surrounded Marion Hall, making it to unsafe, in the view of her bodyguard, for the pundit to attempt entry.  “The University of Ottawa is really easy to get into, isn’t it?” she said in an interview after the cancelled event. “I never get any trouble at the Ivy League schools. It’s always the bush league schools.”

Coulter said she has been speaking regularly at university campuses for a decade. While she has certainly been heckled, she said this is the first time an engagement has been cancelled because of protesters.  “This has never, ever, ever happened before — even at the stupidest American university,” she said.

Coulter remarked on the reception she has had since entering the country.  “Since I’ve arrived in Canada, I’ve been denounced on the floor of Parliament — which, by the way, is on my bucket list — my posters have been banned, I’ve been accused of committing a crime in a speech that I have not yet given, I was banned by the student council, so welcome to Canada!”

The “accusation” of which Coulter speaks is a reference to an e-mail she received from University of Ottawa vice-president and provost Francois Houle on Friday, warning her that freedom of speech is defined differently in Canada than in the U.S. and that she should take care not to step over the line.

Coulter said that letter set the tone for and encouraged the protesters. She said it’s well known on the campus speaking circuit that conservatives need to travel with security staff, as she did.

“I’m pretty sure little Francois A-Houle does not need to travel with a bodyguard,” she said. “I would like to know when this sort of violence, this sort of protest, has been inflicted upon a Muslim — who appear to be, from what I’ve read of the human rights complaints, the only protected group in Canada. I think I’ll give my speech tomorrow night in a burka. That will protect me.”

Canadian conservative political commentator Ezra Levant, the other speaker travelling with Coulter on the three-city tour, presented by the International Free Press Society of Canada, told the half-filled hall that no more people would be able to enter and that Coulter had been advised it would not be safe for her to appear.

Coulter’s bodyguard ultimately made the judgment, after conferring with security staff on site.

In a short speech, Levant said Tuesday was “an embarrassing day for the University of Ottawa and their student body, who could not debate Ann Coulter . . . who chose to silence her through threats and intimidation, just like their vice-president did.”

Levant laid the blame squarely on Houle.  “A fish rots from the head down,” he said. “Francois Houle got his wish. He telegraphed to the community that the University of Ottawa is not a place for free debate.”  Houle could not be reached for comment Tuesday night.  Levant said the spectacle showed “just how eroded our Canadian values of free speech have become” — especially on university campuses.

“I think this has turned into a teaching moment for the entire country, a reminder that freedom of speech is a Canadian value,” he said.  Rita Valeriano was one of several protesters inside the hall who, with chants of “Coulter go home!” shouted down the International Free Press Society of Canada organizer who was addressing the crowd.

Valeriano, a 19-year-old sociology and women’s studies student, said later that she was happy Coulter was unable to speak the “hatred” she had planned to.  “On campus, we promise our students a safe and positive space,” she said. “And that’s not what (Coulter) brings.”

Topan was pleased to hear the students behind her shout, “Hate speech cancelled!” in unison.  “I think that’s great. I think we accomplished what we were here to do, to ensure that we don’t have her discriminatory rhetoric on our campus,” she said.  Jonathan Reid, 18, a Carleton political science student and a fan of Coulter, brought a book to be signed.

[…]

Don’t forget, gentle readers, you are the violent and intolerant ones!  lol  That’s their story, and they’re sticking to it!  But I get that Ann Coulter is a bomb thrower.  I get why she pisses Libs off.  She tweaks them and she provokes them.  It’s obvious she isn’t trying to make nice with them.  I get all that.  But she’s not anymore controversial or offensive than, say, a Bill Maher is.  He hates us, and we loathe him right back.  End of story.  I don’t see any conservatives driving him out or shutting him down, do you?  That’s the difference between conservatives today (who are basically JFK Liberals), and what counter culture Liberalism has become.  That’s why conservative speakers need bodyguards on a university campus, while nobody else does, not even Islamists.  Can you imagine, an Islamist is safer on a university campus than a christian conservative?  Truly we have lost the culture.  We have lost the West.  Long live the Caliphate.

8 Comments »

  1. so much for the canada nice image … this is exactly the kind of ‘Liberal fascism’ that drives any self respecting liberal out of that camp

    Comment by paleocon — March 24, 2010 @ 07:30

  2. I would like to congratulate the students of my alma-mater for their good taste in preventing yet another neo-fascist, retarded idiot from poluting our air with her garbage. On the down side this will mean yet more fees for her Canadian-based pimp, Ezra Levant. Are their no intelligent right-wingers left in the US? Where is Wm Buckley when you need him?

    Comment by JohnDoucette — March 24, 2010 @ 08:19

  3. Wm Buckley would recognize your ‘definition’ of ‘hate speech’ as nothing more than brainless Newspeak …

    If your idea of ‘intelligent’ is agreeing with your drivel then please don’t soil the name of the good Mr. Buckley –who i’m sure you’ve never read a word of.

    Like most zombie Libs you love the idea / branding of Mr. Buckley for the sake of sentimentality rather then his substance.

    don’t you have a brick to throw through a Starbucks window or something? Get lost.

    Comment by paleocon — March 24, 2010 @ 08:25

  4. >>> neo-fascist. retarded. idiot. garbage.

    Doucette,

    I hardly think you’d know what to do with an intelligent rightwinger.

    Comment by Jesusland — March 24, 2010 @ 09:30

  5. John, little sweetie, grownups recognize the ad hominem when they say it. “All your argument now belong us.” I can see you made the most of your undergrad experience. What was your major? Droit Civil? Ce serait ironique, même si vous ne pouvez pas apprécier l’ironie.

    Comment by Thorvald — March 24, 2010 @ 19:20

  6. In Canada we tolerate differences, not hate. People have the right to not have to be subject to hatred expressed towards them under the ‘guise’ of freedom of speech. Americans may not like that law. They may feel Canadians should be able to spit venim at anyone they so chose. Why Americans would concern themselves with the laws Canadians decide to have or not have is quite a curiosity. Mabe some of you could help me understand. Nontheless, whether you agree with our laws or not is irrelevant. Want is relevant however, is that our laws are adhered to, lest an individual finds themselves in front of a judge.
    I’m sure Ann has more pressing issues at home that should be occupying her vastly intellectual mind.

    Comment by Dave — March 26, 2010 @ 22:05

  7. Yeah, and of course, you Libs have the monopoly on deciding what constitutes “hate.” That’s mighty convenient. Thanks for confirming what we already suspected.

    Comment by Jesusland — March 26, 2010 @ 22:09

  8. Yep, this is the evert tolerennnnnt left..

    Comment by themadjewess — March 31, 2010 @ 19:54


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: