Counterculture Con HQ

May 11, 2010

Vandals Desecrate WW1 Memorial

This one is just too outrageous to wait on. After 75 years in the desert a memorial cross for veterans of WW1 –most recently embroiled in a leagal dispute questioning its ‘constitutionality’ (which is a joke since separation of church and state is the only ink on the Constitution the New Liberal agenda seems to care about!)– vandals have torn it down. Predictably, after frothing at the mouth following the Supreme Court battle to take it down major news outlets (ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN) are slow to move on the story. (source)

a memorial to WW1 veterans

Please comment if you think I’m missing something here, but it is now clear that the ‘Western front’ has blown wide open. The rules of engagement are in the favor of the secular progressives. I for one am beginning to wonder if the Union will last another 25 years?

(i’ll continue to monitor the line to see how the story unfolds)

Advertisements

3 Comments »

  1. >>>which is a joke since separation of church and state is the only ink on the Constitution the New Liberal agenda seems to care about!

    Tellingly, it’s not even in the Constitution!

    Comment by Jesusland — May 11, 2010 @ 11:58

  2. Right, to be clear though, the first amendment does have a long history of opinion and interpretation … but to claim and impose a strict ‘separation’ or ‘endorsement’ is just as radical as attempting to impose an ‘endorsement’. Right?

    It seems to stand more of a litmus test for where society is and how it operates (which for the last 200 plus odd years has been in judeo-christian thinking and practice) than anything else.

    Ultimately, this act is an act of ‘symbolic’ warfare as devastating as any car bomb or cannon fire. I don’t care what the Supreme Court says the cross is the enemy of the ‘New America’.

    Comment by Jesusland — May 11, 2010 @ 12:08

  3. Right, to be clear though, the first amendment does have a long history of opinion and interpretation … but to claim and impose a strict ‘separation’ is just as radical as attempting to impose an ‘endorsement’. Right?

    It seems to stand more of a litmus test for where society is and how it operates (which for the last 200 plus odd years has been in judeo-christian thinking and practice) than anything else.

    Ultimately, this act is an act of ‘symbolic’ warfare as devastating as any car bomb or cannon fire. I don’t care what the Supreme Court says the cross is the enemy of the ‘New America’.

    Comment by paleocon — May 11, 2010 @ 12:09


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: