Counterculture Con HQ

July 14, 2010

Eric Holder will sue Arizona, But not Sanctuary cities

That makes a whole heck of a lot of sense!

Eric Holder is suing Arizona under the supremacy clause even though Arizona’s law merely restates Federal law, yet will not sue so-called sanctuary cities for VIOLATING federal law.  Brilliant!

No plan to file lawsuits against “sanctuary cities” for refusing to cooperate with feds

The Obama administration said this week that there is no reason to sue so-called sanctuary cities for refusing to cooperate with federal authorities, whereas Arizona’s new immigration law was singled out because it “actively interferes” with enforcement.

“There is a big difference between a state or locality saying they are not going to use their resources to enforce a federal law, as so-called sanctuary cities have done, and a state passing its own immigration policy that actively interferes with federal law,” Tracy Schmaler, a spokeswoman for Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., told The Washington Times. “That’s what Arizona did in this case.”

But the author of the 1996 federal law that requires states and localities to cooperate says the administration is misreading it, and says drawing a distinction between sanctuary cities and Arizona is “flimsy justification” for suing the state.

“For the Justice Department to suggest that they won’t take action against those who passively violate the law –who fail to comply with the law — is absurd,” said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the ranking Republican on the House Judiciary Committee and chief author of the 1996 immigration law. “Will they ignore individuals who fail to pay taxes? Will they ignore banking laws that require disclosure of transactions over $10,000? Of course not.”

And Mr. Smith said the administration doesn’t appear to understand that law, which requires localities to share information on illegal immigrants with federal authorities.  “The White House is just plain wrong on the premise since the Arizona law mirrors federal law – it does not ‘interfere’ with it,” he said.

The Arizona law, which goes into effect July 29 unless a court blocks it, requires authorities to inquire about the legal status of anyone they detain who they have reasonable suspicion might be in the country illegally. The law as amended specifically prohibits using race or ethnicity as a reason for suspicion.



  1. “Please put more information about your second paragraph, Have you thought about adding some videos to the article? I think it might enhance my understanding. “

    Comment by GOLDSBERRY — December 12, 2010 @ 13:29

  2. Excellent post! I am also going to publish a blog article relating to this… thank you

    Comment by Carl — September 12, 2011 @ 01:19

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: