Counterculture Con HQ

May 29, 2011

Hateful facts: Virtually ALL rapes in Oslo last year committed by “Non-Westerners”

These facts are “hateful” because they don’t conform to the Liberal orthodoxy of multiculturalism.  From the Diversity is Strength™ files: In Oslo all sexual assaults involving rape in the past year have been committed by men of non-western background.  This was the conclusion of a police report published today.  This means that every single rape assault in the last five years, where the rapist could be identified, he was a man of foreign origin. 

Ain’t multiculturalism just grand!  The terms “non-Western” and “foreign” in this context means Middle Eastern and Muslim.

Who cares if your women are being raped, at least you have a large selection of ethnic restaurants at which to wine and dine them!  What is happening to Scandinavian women reminds me of something in one of CCHQ’s very first posts over a year ago.  From The Wilding of Sarah Palin, an old school feminist lamenting the damage feminism has caused to women also has a few choice words for Liberal men:

Like for most feminists, it was a no-brainer for me to become a Democrat. Liberal men, not conservatives, were the ones devoted to women’s issues. They marched at my side in support of abortion rights. They were enthusiastic about women succeeding in the workplace.

As time went on, I had many experiences that should have made me rethink my certainty. But I remained nestled in cognitive dissonance — therapy jargon for not wanting to see what I didn’t want to see.

One clue: the miscreants who were brutalizing me didn’t exactly look Reagan-esque. In middle and high schools, they were minority kids enraged about forced busing. On the streets of New York City and Berkeley, they were derelicts and hoodlums.

Another red flag: while liberal men did indeed hold up those picket signs, they didn’t do anything else to protect me. In fact, their social programs enabled bad behavior and bred chaos in urban America. And when I was accosted by thugs, those leftist men were missing in action.

What else should have tipped me off? Perhaps the fact that so many men in ultra-left Berkeley are sleazebags. Rarely a week goes by that I don’t hear stories from my young female clients about middle-aged men preying on them. With the rationale of moral relativism, these creeps feel they can do anything they please.

Bottom line?  The socialist/Leftist/Liberal men of Europe who’ve decided mass Islamic immigration is the way to go CAN’T/WON’T DO ANYTHING TO PROTECT THEIR WOMEN.  They are missing in action.

January 16, 2011

Liberal accuses Sarah Palin of Making the Story About Herself

Sarah Palin can’t win.  If she does nothing, she’s trashed.  If she responds, she’s trashed as well.  Her enemies circle her like a pack of hyenas around a lioness, waiting for an opening to strike and draw blood.  Here conservative champion Charles Krauthammer easily handles Mark Shield’s insinuation that Palin had “inserted” herself into the Tucson shooting story, and exposes the media for the LIBERAL WHORES they really are.  Not a Palin fan here, but she gets my vote come election time.  These people have to be stopped.

Vodpod videos no longer available.

“Speaking truth to power”, Anti-Palin Posters Appear in San Fran

Hateful rhetoric: Palin Derangement Syndrome

Can you feel the love?  How mistaken I was to believe the Left’s derangement would end when Bush left office.  Clearly, many on the Left don’t feel President Obama was talking about them when he spoke about toning down the rhetoric.  Was he?  He certainly didn’t name names.  Palin Derangement Syndrome’s latest incarnation takes the shape of posters which proclaim “Enrage them with fear until they feel justified in their violence,” and then mockingly, “God Bless America.” The backdrop is a mushroom cloud.  These “flower children” of the Left are the same people accusing Sarah Palin (and ultimately YOU) of hateful and inciting language.  Yet their own loving utterances don’t qualify as hate speech for the simple reason that the target of their speech is on the Right, and because the Left only “speaks truth to power.”  Their bile is merited, while your speech is nothing more than the last dying gasps of “white privilege.”  This self-perception– speaking truth to power– unshackles Leftists from any limits which simple human decency and decorum might place upon them. You see, secular progressive morality is based on having the correct ideology, and little to do with their personal behavior, so they can act as beastly as they goddam please because their cause is just.

Deranged Leftist threatens Tea Party leader with Death

Leftwing activist, Eric Fuller

Wow, Sarah Palin’s rhetoric is so heated and vitriolic that even LEFTISTS respond with violence!

Tucson tea party leader Trent Humphries was threatened by Leftwing activist during ABC interview.

Trent Humphries, the Pima County tea party leader, stood up to speak during the event. He was being very respectful. Trent told the audience that before we start placing blame on individuals we need to get all the facts. Trent then told everyone that one of those killed during the shooting was his neighbor and that he was affected like everyone else by the tragedy… While Trent was speaking- And it was planned that he would speak- One member in the audience and reportedly one of the victims of the tragedy started screaming, “Trent Humphries you’re dead!” The police immediately escorted him out. On his way out he screamed, “You’re all whores.”

Source

Palin’s fault!  For the sake of full disclosure, it’s worth noting that Eric Fuller, a Leftwing activist who has attacked the Tea Party as a “crime syndicate”, was one of the victims in the Tucson shooting.  He was shot in the knee.  Fuller claims Sarah Palin and other Republican leaders have created a “toxic atmosphere” (for which presumably he can blame his own deranged outburst, his own loving language not exactly filling the air with the smell of roses).

After eight years of Bush Derangement Syndrome, unhinged Leftists are hardly news.  In this case though, I’m certainly willing to grant this individual may have been suffering from PTDS from the Tucson shootings, and thus his hateful and violent outburst.  I can be generous in that way.  In other words, he wasn’t in his right mind.  You know, like Jared Loughner. But it’s curious, isn’t it, how everybody EXCEPT for Teabaggers are driven to madness by Sarah Palin’s rhetoric. lol

UPDATE: Media whore, ABC News, scrubbed the incident from their broadcast (do you really think they’ve have done the same if a Rightwinger had been arrested?), but fair and balanced Fox News got their hands on the video showing cops leading him away.

January 12, 2011

The Dishonesty of Bill Maher

Bill Maher typifies the depths to which the Left will sink in order to score political points against their enemies.  They don’t even try to be honest and consistent.  Here Maher speaks for many if not most on the Left as he explains why Liberals are the epitome of tolerance, prudence and virtue, while conservatives are EVIL, MEAN, NASTY inciters who make jihadis look like pikers (yes, he almost goes that far).  Anderson Cooper asks him why Libs insisted we not “rush to judgment” in the aftermath of Ft. Hood, yet may be doing just that with the Jared Loughner shooting.  His answer?  “I don’t understand that analogy.” Nuance! Anderson Cooper has no follow up question to that (they never do when they’re interviewing their fellow travellers).

Maher also says his own incitement to hatred and violence (see his Cheney deathwish below) is merely “comedy”, President Obama’s “gun to a knife fight” comment was metaphorical (which it was), but Palin’s “targeted” districts graphic was an incitement to violence.

He’s all over the map on this one.  That is a sign of one thing and one thing only– INTELLECTUAL DISHONESTY.  They are lying to you, America.  They incite hatred and violence, call it comedy or “speaking truth to power”, and then use character assassination and blood libel to attack so-called incitement by conservatives.

Defends Obama’s ‘Gun to Knife-Fight’ Comment

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Bill Maher Speaks on Tucson Shooting, G…, posted with vodpod

Says Cheney’s Death Would Save Lives

Bill Maher: “I’m just saying if [Cheney] did die, other people, more people would live. That’s a fact.”

January 11, 2011

Liberal Fascism: Talk radio under siege

Watch for this one.  Leftists never let a crisis go to waste.  Jared Loughner is simply too valuable an opportunity for them.  He could turn things around for Obama, and for flagging Liberalism.  Or so they believe.  It’s not enough that they utterly control print media and television, as well as Academia and Hollywood.  They must control it ALL.  Rep. James Clyburn (D-S.C), one of the most frenzied voices in the wake of the Arizona shooting says we need to bring back the so-called Fairness Doctrine.  He wants “balanced coverage” (but only on AM radio, nowhere else), and he says attacking the Left is “incitement” and tantamount to “yelling fire in a crowded theater.”  Because Leftists don’t use “heated rhetoric.” Of course not!  Only conservatives do.

Return of the Fairness Doctrine

COLUMBIA — U.S. Rep. Jim Clyburn, the third-ranking Democrat in Congress, said Sunday the deadly shooting in Arizona should get the country thinking about what’s acceptable to say publicly and when people should keep their mouths shut.

Clyburn said he thinks vitriol in public discourse led to a 22-year-old suspect opening fire Saturday at an event Democratic U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords held for her constituents in Tucson, Ariz. Six people were killed and 14 others were injured, including Giffords.

The shooting is cause for the country to rethink parameters on free speech, Clyburn said from his office, just blocks from the South Carolina Statehouse. He wants standards put in place to guarantee balanced media coverage with a reinstatement of the Fairness Doctrine, in addition to calling on elected officials and media pundits to use ‘better judgment.’

‘Free speech is as free speech does,’ he said. ‘You cannot yell ‘fire’ in a crowded theater and call it free speech and some of what I hear, and is being called free speech, is worse than that.’  Clyburn used as an example a comment made by Sharron Angle, an unsuccessful U.S. senatorial candidate in Nevada, who said the frustrated public may consider turning to ‘Second Amendment remedies’ for political disputes unless Congress changed course.

Clyburn said the man accused of shooting Giffords did just that.  ‘He saw a Second Amendment remedy and that’s what occurred here and there is no way not to make that connection,’ Clyburn said.  Despite Clyburn’s position, law enforcement has not yet revealed any motives in the shooting.  Clyburn has been the most outspoken of the state’s congressional delegation on the shooting.

U.S. Rep. Tim Scott, the 1st District Republican, said the Fairness Doctrine would stifle free speech and be harmful to the public, but he would say little on the matter beyond that. Engaging in a partisan conversation is not appropriate now, Scott said, because the focus of Saturday’s shooting should remain on prayer for the victims.

‘A 9-year-old little girl is gone and the Fairness Doctrine is not going to bring her back,’ Scott said.

Source

November 28, 2010

The Sarah Palin Myth

What’s the big deal about Sarah Palin? Seriously, it’s like I live in an alternate universe when people are talking about her. Don’t get me wrong, I have nothing against Sarah Palin the person or the politician, but I can’t quite wrap my mind around the Palin phenomenon. I don’t understand why some conservatives are so crazy about her. I suppose it’s a response to the Liberal derangement?  And what’s with the frothing at the mouth, Libs?  But I get exactly why the Lib MEDIA continues to propagate her myth– they know she can’t win in a general election.

Vodpod videos no longer available.

November 1, 2010

CBS Affiliate Conspiring to Smear Tea Party Candidate?

Here’s the tape Sarah Palin was talking about.  It’s garbled as hell, but the CBS affiliate concedes it’s real, and their own explanation rings entirely false.  They say they were ordering their reporters to “review what-if scenarios, discussing the likelihood of events at the rally and how KTVA might logistically disseminate any late-breaking news.”  Yeah, a sex offender at a Joe Miller rally is a “what-if scenario” they need to plan for.  Uh huh.  Sure.

As always, you be the judge:

FEMALE REPORTER: That’s up to you because you’re the expert, but that’s what I would do…I’d wait until you see who showed up because that indicates we already know something…[Laughter] [INAUDIBLE]

FEMALE REPORTER: Child molesters…

MALE REPORTER: Oh yeah… can you repeat Joe Miller’s…uh… list of people, campaign
workers, which one’s the molester? [INAUDIBLE]

FEMALE VOICE: We know that out of all the people that will show up tonight, at least one of them will be a registered sex offender.[Laughter]

MALE REPORTER: You have to find that one person… [INAUDIBLE]

FEMALE REPORTER: And the one thing we can do is ….we won’t know….we won’t know but if there is any sort of chaos whatsoever we can put out a twitter/facebook alert: saying what the… ‘Hey Joe Miller punched at rally.’

FEMALE REPORTER: Kinda like Rand Paul…I like that. [Laughter] That’s a good one.

October 31, 2010

Sarah Palin: Media are corrupt Bastards

Love it.  Palin goes off on the GOP establishment, Dems and the corrupt-to-their-rotten-core Liberal media.  Bastardos!

“That’s sick. Those are corrupt bastards, Chris.”

August 30, 2010

MLK’s Niece at Beck’s Rally

Conservatism sweeps the Nation’s capital as Alveda King speaks at Beck’s rally about race, abortion, faith in the public square, the culture war.  Liberals predictably won’t touch her with a ten foot pole and instead attack the far safer targets Beck and Palin.

“MLK would encourage us to lay aside the divisive lies that cause us to think we are members of separate races.”

“Alleluyah.  We still trust in God.”

Vodpod videos no longer available.

July 23, 2010

How the narrative is hatched

The now infamous JournoList provides us an absolutely priceless look into the sausage factory that is the Liberal media.  This is how the talking points are gathered and the memos written to create what I’ve always thought was a suspiciously consistent media narrative.  And consistent (with but a few exceptions) in a highly convenient way for Libs.  Recall the montages that Rush Limbaugh likes to play to make this very point.  Example:

HARRIS: It seems so long ago that the economy was literally on the brink.
CLIFT: (crosstalk) He brought the economy back from the brink.
KEILAR: Two years ago the U.S. economy being on the brink of collapse.
HARWOOD: helped pull the economy back from the brink.
MENENDEZ: He has managed to get a lot done, saving the economy from the brink.
LOTHIAN: As the President has pointed out it’s been brought back from the brink.
CARLSON: Obama having to regulate the banks, after the banks put all of us on the brink of a economic collapse.

When McCain picked Palin as his VP, members of this online forum began to formulate the most effective way to attack her and defeat the McCain campaign.  Much of what you see in the JournoList emails will sound familiar to you because this is the narrative the media promoted.  The following exchanges are just from the day of the announcement.

The conversation began with a debate over how best to attack Sarah Palin. “Honestly, this pick reeks of desperation,” wrote Michael Cohen of the New America Foundation in the minutes after the news became public. “How can anyone logically argue that Sarah Pallin [sic], a one-term governor of Alaska, is qualified to be President of the United States? Train wreck, thy name is Sarah Pallin.”

Not a wise argument, responded Jonathan Stein, a reporter for Mother Jones. If McCain he were asked about Palin’s inexperience, he could simply point to then candidate Barack Obama’s similarly thin resume. “Q: Sen. McCain, given Gov. Palin’s paltry experience, how is she qualified to be commander in chief?,” Stein asked hypothetically. “A: Well, she has much experience as the Democratic nominee.”

Politico reporter Ben Adler, now an editor at Newsweek, replied, “but doesn’t leaving sad baby without its mother while she campaigns weaken that family values argument? Or will everyone be too afraid to make that point?”

Suzanne Nossel, chief of operations for Human Rights Watch, added a novel take: “I think it is and can be spun as a profoundly sexist pick.  Women should feel umbrage at the idea that their votes can be attracted just by putting a woman, any woman, on the ticket no matter her qualifications or views.”

Mother Jones’s Stein loved the idea. “That’s excellent! If enough people – people on this list? – write that the pick is sexist, you’ll have the networks debating it for days.  And that negates the SINGLE thing Palin brings to the ticket,” he wrote.

A lot more here

This is “the news”, folks.  And now the media is on the defensive, saying that it’s mostly Leftwing opinion writers who we see here involved in coordinating a message, not real mainstream journalists.  I don’t know.  Joe Klein from Time magazine is in there.  Ezra Klein from the Washington Post founded the damn thing.  Mother Jones and The Economist are in there.  Newsweek is in there.  The New Yorker is in there.  Those are just the ones I know about.  They weren’t offended by all this, though.  In fact, they ran with this ball.  It’s pretty clear from the actual reporting that the MSM was following the narrative and tactics as brainstormed on JournoList.  I wonder if Peter Wallsten is part of Journolist.  He is the reporter at the LA Times that refused to release the video of the Obama/Khalidi/Ayers/Dohrn lovefest.  No, it was more important to bash Palin for her clothing budget.

June 14, 2010

The Feminist Con Job

Radical feminism is to sexism what the race hustlers are to race– a big con.  Via Ann Althouse.

Vodpod videos no longer available.

“That’s Tina Brown trying to babble her way to saying something that makes sense. Watch the video at the link. I think she realizes in the middle — at the “you know, very much, uh, uh, you know” — that after invoking the big idea “feminism,” she doesn’t know how to say the right thing about feminism. It’s not right to say according to feminism, women aren’t supposed to be Republicans, so she can’t say that. What then can she say? She goes with the weak, mealy-mouthed “against so many of things that women have fought for such a long time.” So many of the things, eh? What? And fought for such a long time — as if women are supposed to — what? — adhere to traditional values and not make waves?

And what about the idea that there is variety within feminism and vivid debate about what is good for women? George Stephanopoulos pushes Brown with “Well, you could argue they’re different kinds of feminists….” And Brown settles in to the routine partisanship that is easy to spit out clearly: “Women, too, can be wing nuts, is the point.” Yeah, that’s cogent and clear. Funny too. Brown’s attempt at a point about feminism was flabby blather because it was dishonest. “Women, too, can be wing nuts” — she’s telling it straight now and shows it with the kicker that it’s “the point.” Thanks for abandoning your pretense of intellectual analysis for some plain politics. We get it, Tina. You’re a liberal. You don’t like when strong candidates emerge on the other side. And you have nothing interesting or insightful to say about feminism. Noted.”

Source at Ann Althouse

April 13, 2010

Woman Savagely Beaten For Wearing Palin Pins… Media Silent

I was going to say the Lib Media was “strangely” silent about this, but that’s not strange at all.  This is exactly the kind of story they would intentionally ignore, and even actively conceal.

Woman & Boyfriend Savagely Beaten For Wearing Palin Pins – Including Broken Leg, Jaw, Concussion… Media Silent

Allee Bautsch, chief campaign fundraiser for Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal, and her boyfriend Joe Brown, were savagely beaten Friday night in New Orleans after leaving a Republican party fundraising dinner by a group of thugs who reportedly targeted the couple because they were wearing Sarah Palin pins.

Bautch’s leg was broken and Brown incurred a broken jaw and nose as well as a concussion.

The Hayride reports that a source who visited Bautsch at the hospital the day after the attack says they were told the couple was attacked for wearing Palin buttons:

Two people at the Brennan’s event have now confirmed that the protest had largely broken up by the time it ended, but we also understand from someone who visited Allee Bautsch in the hospital Saturday morning that she and Brown were followed and attacked expressly because they had Palin pins on (she heard one of the attackers say “Let’s get them, they have Palin pins on” – so the attack WAS politically motivated as its victims understood it. It was not a mugging, it was not an argument gone wrong and it was not a bar fight.

The story of a Republican and her boyfriend being viciously attacked for wearing Palin buttons has yet to make national headlines, unlike say, unfounded rumors of nasty words being said by Tea Party protesters.

[…]

Now, about those violent Teabaggers…

February 10, 2010

Sarah Palin Delivers Speech Without a Teleprompter

Like that scene in Star Wars where Obi Wan tells Darth Vader “you may strike me down, but I will only become more powerful.”  And what did the moron do?  He struck Obi down.  Here they go after Sarah Palin for [gasp!!!] writing some notes on her palm!  But I think these attacks only make her stronger:

But remember, gentle readers, it’s YOU who are the “angry” ones!

I’m not a Palin fan.  To me she’s useful primarily as a mirror on the Left.  What they do to her tells me about them, not her.  But lately I’m beginning to wonder.  Their unrelenting hatred of her is so beyond the pale of rationality that I’m forced again and again to reconsider just what she may have to offer.  They obviously see something about her which scares the crap out of them.  Could they be right?  Could little ol’ Sarah really be a threat to them?  Is it possible she’s for real?  I’m now beginning to ask myself that every time they go after her for stupid crap like this.  And make no mistake, whenever they attack Palin it’s for stupid crap like this.  Yes, I know, they say she’s the stupid one, and what have you.  But who’s actually the stupid one here?  Not Palin.  Which one of you hasn’t written notes on your hand?  So again, who’s the stupid one?  I think these attacks are only making her stronger.  Americans like rooting for the underdog, and they don’t like bullies; and the Leftists in the MSM are nothing if not bullies.  So keep it up, morons.  You’re only making her stronger.

January 4, 2010

Is This Really Necessary?

Hung in effigy.

Good grief.  Is this really necessary?  Have some respect, if not for Obama, then for the Office.

BARACK OBAMA HUNG IN EFFIGY

PLAINS, Ga. — The U.S. Secret Service says it is investigating an effigy of President Barack Obama found hanging from a building in the hometown of former President Jimmy Carter.

Secret Service spokesman Ed Donovan told The Associated Press that the large black doll was found Saturday morning along Main Street in the small town of Plains.

Footage from WALB-TV shows the doll was hanging by a noose in front of a red, white and blue sign that says “Plains, Georgia. Home of Jimmy Carter, our 39th President.” A witness told the station that the doll had a sign with Obama’s name on it.

The Huffbots are in a tizzy. Of course, their issue is, what else– racism.  To which CCHQ responds, whatever.  Effigies are a staple of American political life.  Remember this one?

Palin Derangement Syndrome

Every president in American history has been hung in effigy.  Barack Obama shouldn’t be an exception just because of his race, but because of simple human decency.  But..but..but the history of black lynching!  To which I respond, get over it.  Barack Obama’s election to the highest office in the world is the African-American community’s coming of age.  They stand as fully equal and fully American with everybody else.  Being treated like everybody else, including seeing one of your own hung in effigy, is part of that coming of age.  Painful?  Maybe.  But you suck it up.  Or else a black man as President means nothing, nothing at all.  When a hispanic Republican gets elected to the highest office someday, I want him to be treated like every other president before him was treated.  No coddling, and no condescending favoritism from guilty white Liberals, thank you very much (not that conservatives of color expect any decency from Liberals.  We know better).

Now back to the effigy.  Our republic doesn’t need this garbage.  It’s vile, and in this particular case reflects poorly on conservatives.  To whoever did this, who do you think you’re convincing to your way of thinking?  How many people became Democrats when the Left pulled this kind of crap on Bush?  Huh?  Less than zero.  I can attest to that personally.  This is precisely the kind of derangement that backfires in our face.  This is not the way to run a political insurgency in a democracy.  Knock it off.

January 2, 2010

PC Deconstructed

While there are some folks who don’t believe President Obama is fit to shine Sarah Palin’s shoes, there’s at least one person out there who does.

Fit to shine her shoes.

The latest 911 at Huffington Post. Someone at a state agency in Colorado is actually getting fired because he forwarded an email with this image.  He isn’t even the originator of that email, he just forwarded it.  Now he’s losing his job.

Is that image racist?  Or just demeaning.  I’m going with the latter mainly because the image would still make sense if he were white instead of black.  I’m going to give Barack Obama the benefit of the doubt that he’s man enough to be trashed like any other president.  I’m giving him that dignity.  Which leads me to my next question.  Is it possible that hypersensitivity by white Liberals to the lampooning of a black president is a form of unintentional racism?  A softer kind of racism?  I believe it is.  Because they won’t give him the dignity I just gave him.  Regardless of where you stand on that one, who got fired for this photo?:

Palin posing for Runner's World.

Clearly an effort to demean her by the folks at Newsweak.  And a sexist one at that, for it’s clear that image wouldn’t work if it were a man. Nobody got fired for it.  In fact, he probably got a raise.  Nevertheless it’s still comparatively mild relative to the vile crap they’ve dished on her to date.  From The Wilding of Sarah Palin:
They dehumanize her by objectifying her body.  They undress her with their eyes.  They turn her into a piece of ass.  Liberals do this by calling her a c__nt, ogling her legs, demeaning her with names like “slutty flight attendant” and “Trailer Park Barbie,” and exposing her flesh on the cover of Newsweek.

Indeed.

A few things you need to know about the political correctness game, gentle readers.  Racism trumps sexism (especially when the woman is a conservative), and Liberals can never, EVER be guilty of either.  Recall how they trashed Hillary during the Dem primaries.  PC is intended to regulate your behaviour, not theirs.  It only goes in one direction because it’s for the purpose of controlling you, not them.  That’s why a top Liberal figure in politics, entertainment or media (such as the Editor at Newsweak) who engages in blatant sexism is not deemed to represent the Left as a whole, nor will he pay a price of any kind.  While any random moron who forwards a questionable email about Barack Obama speaks for all conservatives, and loses his job.  Got it?  It’s really not that hard once you figure out the basic ground rules–PC is for the purpose of controlling you and furthering their agenda.  You already knew there was a double standard.  But now you know why.

UPDATE: The person who forwarded that email  is a registered Democrat. Ooops!

December 8, 2009

Alinsky Rule Number 5

I read Saul Alinsky during my first year in college.   His Rules for Radicals is required reading at any self-respecting liberal arts college campus.  In Rules, you learn the basic machiavellian strategies every good Leftist agitator uses to achieve power.  I was only 17 at the time, so you know the Left is getting them young.  The book lists 13 basic rules.  This one’s their favorite:

Rule #5. RIDICULE IS MAN’S MOST POTENT WEAPON.

Ridicule and Mockery.  They are very good at it.  They use it often and liberally, and there is no defense against it.  You can mitigate the damage by laughing along and joining in on the joke.  But it’s tough.  You’ve got to be quick on your feet and develop the hide of a rhino.  But the damage is done.  Whenever they throw a pie at a conservative speaker on campus? Think Alinsky.  The speaker dodging the pie looks like a fool, and twice as foolish if he gets mad.  While the pie thrower is just a prankster, and a hero.  And nobody’s listening to the speaker anymore because they’re thinking about the pie!  Crafty Libs.  Alinsky rule #5 is par for the course for welcoming conservatives speakers to college campuses.  Just google ‘pie’ ‘conservative’ ‘speaker’.

Rule #5 works with tomatoes too:

A man was arrested for allegedly throwing two tomatoes at Sarah Palin from the second floor balcony during a book signing event at the Mall of America in Minnesota, MyFoxTwinCities.com. reported.

Conservatives have to learn these rules.  They are the rules of insurgency.  This is not an escalation, we are merely leveling the field.  More on applying Alinsky’s rules to the new conservative insurgency later.

p.s.,  the guy actually dedicated his rules to Satan! I kid you not.  That, my gentle readers, is a tiny glimpse into the mind of our foe.  A tiny glimpse–yet books could be written about what it reveals.

November 25, 2009

The Wilding of Sarah Palin – Evolution of a Modern Feminist

Paradigm shifts don’t happen very often in a person’s lifetime.  What causes that internal shift is a mystery.  It’s different for each person.  For some people it might be a single event like 9/11.  Or an unexplainable religous conversion.  Or the wilding of Sarah Palin.

Like for most feminists, it was a no-brainer for me to become a Democrat. Liberal men, not conservatives, were the ones devoted to women’s issues. They marched at my side in support of abortion rights. They were enthusiastic about women succeeding in the workplace.

As time went on, I had many experiences that should have made me rethink my certainty. But I remained nestled in cognitive dissonance — therapy jargon for not wanting to see what I didn’t want to see.

One clue: the miscreants who were brutalizing me didn’t exactly look Reagan-esque. In middle and high schools, they were minority kids enraged about forced busing. On the streets of New York City and Berkeley, they were derelicts and hoodlums.

Another red flag: while liberal men did indeed hold up those picket signs, they didn’t do anything else to protect me. In fact, their social programs enabled bad behavior and bred chaos in urban America. And when I was accosted by thugs, those leftist men were missing in action.

What else should have tipped me off? Perhaps the fact that so many men in ultra-left Berkeley are sleazebags. Rarely a week goes by that I don’t hear stories from my young female clients about middle-aged men preying on them. With the rationale of moral relativism, these creeps feel they can do anything they please.

Laugh Out Loud.

Not a huge fan of Sarah Palin myself, but I am appalled at her wilding.  And it’s always fascinating to track a paradigm shift!

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.