Culture destroyer: Jennifer Aniston
Virtually everything modern Liberalism promotes today advances the clock of civilizational collapse.
Jennifer Aniston does not believe that women have to wait — or settle — for a man to start a family. Speaking at a Los Angeles press conference for her movie about artificial insemination, ‘The Switch,’ Aniston said that “times have changed” along with the idea of the traditional family. So if that means having one without the man in the picture, that’s okay.
“Women are realizing more and more that you don’t have to settle, they don’t have to fiddle with a man to have that child,” Aniston said. “They are realizing if it’s that time in their life and they want this part they can do it with or without that.”
“That,” of course, meaning the man. “It’s happening more and more,” said Aniston.
In ‘Switch,’ Aniston, 41, plays a woman who elects to take on life as a single-parent through artificial insemination. When questioned, the most famous single woman on the planet said she didn’t “have plans” to take the insemination option for motherhood at this time.
But she vigorously defended the rights of other single women going down that road. Aniston even engaged in one testy exchange with a reporter who insisted that her movie character was being “selfish” having a child without a father-figure in her life. Minutes after the question was asked, Aniston circled back and insisted that family life has “evolved” from strictly “the traditional stereotype of family.”
“The point of the movie is, what is that which defines family?” Aniston said. “It isn’t necessarily the traditional mother, father, two children and a dog named Spot.” “Love is love and family is what is around you,” she added. Aniston also took issue with the word “selfish” in terms of the single woman moving ahead with the decision to have a child. “I don’t think it’s selfish,” she said. “It’s quite beautiful because there are children that don’t have homes that have a home and can be loved. And that’s extremely important.”
Aniston fielded a slew of questions about motherhood in the press conference promoting the movie about the very-topic which has dogged her in the entertainment media for year. She even dutifully answered yet another question about whether she wants to be a mother in the future. “Yah, I’ve said it years before,” said Aniston. “I still say it. That’s today. Yah.”
Jennifer Aniston’s movie promotes single motherhood by artificial insemination where fathers are irrelevant. That’s what it does. Womyn need men like fish need a bicycle. And she defends this as “family that has evolved.” Yet even in her interview she attempts to walk back her initial support by blurring the line between artificial insemination and adoption. The two are not equivalent, and subconsciously she acknowledges this.
Once we step away from the PC line, single mother families– which are the natural consequence of the 60s counter culture and sexual revolution– are not “evolved” families, they are an unprecedented prehistoric devolution of the family institution. It’s caveman days all over again, folks, where the male is free to plant his seed willy nilly and females are reduced to the status of brood mare. Except today we have the welfare state (i.e., the taxpayer) to foot the bill for the inevitable consequences of this sexual revolution and shattering of traditional cultural taboos.
Jennifer Aniston has the money to do as she pleases. Her wealth insulates her from the consequences of virtually any boneheaded decision she chooses to make. And if she pays for it, then goddess bless her. Yet the baby mamas in waiting to whom she is giving her blessings are not rich. I’d wager most of them are broke. So the children they choose to have on their own– with Jennifer’s blessings– will essentially be wards of the Liberal welfare state. And without a father figure around to impose discipline, they’ll probably end up in jail too.
But though modern Liberalism is a lifestyle only the rich can afford to live, the Left promotes their values to the poor, and it has destroyed their communities in a way rapacious capitalism never could have. Thus the Left’s welfare state has become indispensable in a society whose social institutions have been shattered by that very same moral and cultural relativist Leftwing elite whose values continue to undermine “the traditional stereotype of family.”